- android.gs
- Compare
- X30 vs Pova 4 Pro
Nokia X30 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What X30 does better (13) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display6.3
3.8Performance4.4
8.0Camera4.6
3.8Battery8.2
8.2Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30Pova 4 Pro
| X30 | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164.8 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 77 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 211 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 450 nits+56%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- eSIMYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Weight185 g vs 211 g+14%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme362 vs 346+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%
- Charged in 30 min69% vs 62%+11%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than X30?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+43%
- AnTuTu score403,732 vs 556,518+38%
- Stereo speakersNo · X30: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,920 vs 2,047+7%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X30: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Cloudy Blue, Ice White | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 746 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 403,732 | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,920 | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
