- android.gs
- Compare
- X30 vs Pova Neo 2
Nokia X30 vs Tecno Pova Neo 2
What X30 does better (19) and where Pova Neo 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.4
8.0Camera3.7
3.8Battery7.6
8.2Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30Pova Neo 2
| X30 | Pova Neo 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 170.9 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 77.8 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than Pova Neo 2?
- Main camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- 5GYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 263 ppi+56%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Neo 2: No
Why is Pova Neo 2 better than X30?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+67%
- Memory card slotNo · X30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X30: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | — |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.6 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 170.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Cloudy Blue, Ice White | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 746 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 83.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 403,732 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,920 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS |
