- android.gs
- Compare
- X30 vs Reno8 Lite
Nokia X30 vs OPPO Reno8 Lite
What X30 does better (10) and where Reno8 Lite wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.7
8.0Camera6.1
3.8Battery4.2
8.2Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
X30Reno8 Lite
| X30 | Reno8 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 159.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 73.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 173 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X30 better than Reno8 Lite?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno8 Lite: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Reno8 Lite: No
- eSIMYes · Reno8 Lite: No
- Peak brightness700 nits vs 600 nits+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Charged in 30 min69% vs 62%+11%
Why is Reno8 Lite better than X30?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Memory card slotNo · X30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X30: Yes
- Weight185 g vs 173 g+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.5 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Cloudy Blue, Ice White | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 746 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 403,732 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,920 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 12 |
