How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr Ultra 2025 vs Phantom V Fold2

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2

What Razr Ultra 2025 does better (16) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0Score
16 advantages≈ $600
Higher score
vs
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Tecno · 2024Phantom V Fold2
6.5Score
8 advantages≈ $440
9.6Display6.3
8.8Camera5.8
8.0Battery7.0
8.4Features3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr Ultra 2025Phantom V Fold2
74 × 171.57.2140.4 × 1596.1
Razr Ultra 2025Phantom V Fold2Difference
Height171.5 mm159 mm+12.5 mm
Width74 mm140.4 mm−66.4 mm
Thickness7.2 mm6.1 mm+1.1 mm
Weight199 g249 g−50 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Phantom V Fold2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
  6. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
  7. Weight199 g vs 249 g+25%
  8. Max video8K vs 4K
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
  10. Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×
  11. eSIMYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
  12. Pixel density464 ppi vs 388 ppi+20%

Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Razr Ultra 2025?

  1. Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+22%
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr Ultra 2025: Yes
  3. Wired charging68 W vs 70 W+3%
  4. Screen size7″ vs 7.8″+12%
  5. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 2,000 px+63%
  6. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  7. Thickness7.2 mm vs 6.1 mm+18%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 88.2%+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g249 g
Thickness7.2 mm6.1 mm
Height171.5 mm159 mm
Width74 mm140.4 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackSilicone polymer—
Ingress protectionIP48IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
ColoursPantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, CabaretKarst Green, Rippling Blue
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size7″7.8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px2,000 px
Resolution (height)2,912 px2,296 px
Pixel density464 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits—
Measured brightness—573 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.1%88.2%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteMediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score—1,158,040
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,327
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,559
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.3"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps30 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,700 mAh5,750 mAh
Active use (test)—9.6 h
Wired charging68 W70 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HiOS 14 Fold
Major OS updates promised—2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare