- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr+ 2024 vs Razr+ 2025
Motorola Razr+ 2024 vs Motorola Razr+ 2025
What Razr+ 2024 does better (3) and where Razr+ 2025 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.1
5.9Performance6.4
5.7Camera5.7
4.8Battery3.8
8.4Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr+ 2024Razr+ 2025
| Razr+ 2024 | Razr+ 2025 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 171.4 mm | = |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.1 mm | = |
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr+ 2024 better than Razr+ 2025?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,601 vs 4,989+12%
- Measured brightness1,253 nits vs 1,220 nits+3%
- Charged in 30 min78% vs 73%+7%
Why is Razr+ 2025 better than Razr+ 2024?
- AnTuTu score1,158,987 vs 1,794,400+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Midnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton Edition | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,253 nits | 1,220 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,158,987 | 1,794,400 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,601 | 4,989 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.6 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 73% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Hello UI |
