How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 70+ vs Galaxy Z Fold8

Motorola Razr 70+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

What Razr 70+ does better (5) and where Galaxy Z Fold8 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 70+
Motorola · 2026Razr 70+
7.5Score
5 advantages≈ $1,050
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8
8.8Score
16 advantages≈ $1,650
Higher score
9.2Display7.6
6.2Camera5.5
5.8Battery7.8
6.1Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 70+Galaxy Z Fold8
74 × 171.47.1123.9 × 161.44.5
Razr 70+Galaxy Z Fold8Difference
Height171.4 mm161.4 mm+10 mm
Width74 mm123.9 mm−49.9 mm
Thickness7.1 mm4.5 mm+2.6 mm
Weight189 g201 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 70+ better than Galaxy Z Fold8?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  2. Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
  3. Repairability classB vs C
  4. Weight189 g vs 201 g+6%
  5. Pixel density414 ppi vs 404 ppi+2%

Why is Galaxy Z Fold8 better than Razr 70+?

  1. Major OS updates promised3 vs 72.3×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  4. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+7%
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+58%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  8. Drop resistance classB vs A
  9. Screen size6.9″ vs 7.6″+10%
  10. Resolution (width)1,084 px vs 1,848 px+70%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  12. Thickness7.1 mm vs 4.5 mm+58%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 70+Motorola Razr 70+≈ $1,0507.5
Design
Weight189 g201 g
Thickness7.1 mm4.5 mm
Height171.4 mm161.4 mm
Width74 mm123.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPantone: Mountain ViewGraphite, Cream, Lavender, Pistachio
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size6.9″7.6″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,084 px1,848 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,448 px
Pixel density414 ppi404 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,525 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.1%89.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz4.74 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 840
AnTuTu score—2,197,874
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—10,619
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,459
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh4,800 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—14 h
Wired charging45 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—63%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W20 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-29 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.82 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised37
EU label
Energy classAA
Battery charge cycles1,2001,200
Endurance per cycle49 h49 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classBA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare