- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 5G vs Phantom V Flip
Motorola Razr 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Flip
What Razr 5G does better (3) and where Phantom V Flip wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Display3.8
3.6Camera3.9
2.5Battery3.6
4.0Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 5GPhantom V Flip
| Razr 5G | Phantom V Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.2 mm | 171.7 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 74.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 194 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 5G better than Phantom V Flip?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom V Flip: No
- eSIMYes · Phantom V Flip: No
- Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip: No
Why is Phantom V Flip better than Razr 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity2,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+43%
- Stereo speakersNo · Razr 5G: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.2″ vs 6.9″+11%
- Pixel density373 ppi vs 413 ppi+11%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
- Resolution (width)876 px vs 1,080 px+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 169.2 mm | 171.7 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Eco leather |
| Colours | Polished Graphite, Blush Gold, Liquid Mercury | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable P-OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 876 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,142 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 373 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.7% | 84.6% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 565,851 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,805 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,800 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
