How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 5G vs Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Motorola Razr 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

What Razr 5G does better (3) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 FE wins (22) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 5G
Motorola · 2020Razr 5G
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $530
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2Score
22 advantages≈ $530
Higher score
3.0Display5.8
3.6Camera4.0
2.5Battery3.0
4.0Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 5GGalaxy Z Flip7 FE
72.6 × 169.27.971.9 × 165.16.9
Razr 5GGalaxy Z Flip7 FEDifference
Height169.2 mm165.1 mm+4.1 mm
Width72.6 mm71.9 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness7.9 mm6.9 mm+1 mm
Weight192 g187 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 5G better than Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

  1. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  2. Selfie camera20 MP vs 10 MP2×
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better than Razr 5G?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Battery capacity2,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+43%
  3. Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Razr 5G: Yes
  5. Stereo speakersNo · Razr 5G: Yes
  6. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  7. CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
  8. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 5G: Yes
  10. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. 4K selfie videoNo · Razr 5G: Yes
  12. Pixel density373 ppi vs 426 ppi+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 5GMotorola Razr 5G≈ $5304.3
Design
Weight192 g187 g
Thickness7.9 mm6.9 mm
Height169.2 mm165.1 mm
Width72.6 mm71.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protection—IP48
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPolished Graphite, Blush Gold, Liquid MercuryBlack, White
Display
Screen size6.2″6.7″
PanelFoldable P-OLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)876 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,142 px2,640 px
Pixel density373 ppi426 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,444 nits
Screen-to-body ratio70.7%85.5%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5GExynos 2400
Chip makerQualcommExynos
Process7 nm4 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 620Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score—1,355,845
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,108
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,036
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.57"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity2,800 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.2 h
Wired charging15 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorRearSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.84 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 10Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 8
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,700
Endurance per cycle—37 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare