android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs nubia Flip

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Flip

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (13) and where nubia Flip wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

13 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

ZTE · 2024nubia Flip

5.7Score

3 advantages≈ $270

9.1Display8.0

5.7Camera3.2

5.2Battery3.8

6.1Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 Ultranubia Flip

	Razr 50 Ultra	nubia Flip	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	170 mm	+1.4 mm
Width	74 mm	75.5 mm	−1.5 mm
Thickness	7.1 mm	7 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	189 g	214 g	−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than nubia Flip?

Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Flip: No
Telephoto cameraYes · nubia Flip: No
Wireless chargingYes · nubia Flip: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
4K selfie videoYes · nubia Flip: No
Weight189 g vs 214 g+13%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%

Why is nubia Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+8%
Pixel density413 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,188 px+10%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	ZTE nubia Flip≈ $2705.7
Design
Weight	189 g	214 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	7 mm
Height	171.4 mm	170 mm
Width	74 mm	75.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Glass
Ingress protection	IPX8	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Sunshine Gold, Cosmic Black, Flowering Lilac
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,188 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,790 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	439 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	86.3%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 644
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	—
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	4,310 mAh
Active use (test)	12.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	83%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—