android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs Mix Flip

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Flip

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (5) and where Mix Flip wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

5 advantages≈ $540

Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip

8.1Score

13 advantages≈ $720

Higher score

9.1Display7.7

5.5Performance7.4

5.7Camera6.4

5.2Battery7.0

6.1Features6.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraMix Flip

	Razr 50 Ultra	Mix Flip	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	167.5 mm	+3.9 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm	=
Thickness	7.1 mm	7.6 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	189 g	190 g	−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Mix Flip?

Wireless chargingYes · Mix Flip: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
Loudspeaker loudness-22.5 LUFS vs -27.6 LUFS+-18%
Thickness7.1 mm vs 7.6 mm+7%

Why is Mix Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

AnTuTu score1,140,567 vs 1,609,570+41%
Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+20%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 6,035+36%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,567 vs 4,209+64%
Max video4K vs 8K
Pixel density413 ppi vs 460 ppi+11%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
Measured brightness1,265 nits vs 1,314 nits+4%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	Xiaomi Mix Flip≈ $7208.1
Design
Weight	189 g	190 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	7.6 mm
Height	171.4 mm	167.5 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Glass
Ingress protection	IPX8	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Black, White, Purple
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	1,314 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	87.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	1,609,570
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	6,035
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	4,209
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2×	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	4,780 mAh
Active use (test)	12.1 h	12 h
Wired charging	45 W	67 W
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	-27.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	3	—