android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs Phantom V Flip

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Flip

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (18) and where Phantom V Flip wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

18 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Tecno · 2023Phantom V Flip

4.4Score

2 advantages≈ $600

9.1Display3.8

5.5Performance2.0

5.7Camera3.9

5.2Battery3.6

6.1Features4.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraPhantom V Flip

	Razr 50 Ultra	Phantom V Flip	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	171.7 mm	−0.3 mm
Width	74 mm	74.1 mm	−0.1 mm
Thickness	7.1 mm	7 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	189 g	194 g	−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Phantom V Flip?

AnTuTu score1,140,567 vs 565,8512×
Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 2,805+58%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom V Flip: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Phantom V Flip: No
Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Flip: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Measured brightness1,265 nits vs 818 nits+55%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip: No

Why is Phantom V Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	Tecno Phantom V Flip≈ $6004.4
Design
Weight	189 g	194 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	7 mm
Height	171.4 mm	171.7 mm
Width	74 mm	74.1 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Eco leather
Ingress protection	IPX8	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	413 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	818 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	84.6%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 8050
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Mali-G77 MC9
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	565,851
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	2,805
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.73"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	4,000 mAh
Active use (test)	12.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	100%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	-22.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—