- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 50 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
What Razr 50 Ultra does better (17) and where Galaxy Z Fold3 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display3.8
5.5Performance4.6
5.7Camera4.6
5.2Battery4.0
6.1Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 50 UltraGalaxy Z Fold3 5G
| Razr 50 Ultra | Galaxy Z Fold3 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 158.2 mm | +13.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 128.1 mm | −54.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 271 g | −82 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
- AnTuTu score1,140,567 vs 635,918+79%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits2.5×
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,567 vs 1,433+79%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 4 MP8×
- Weight189 g vs 271 g+43%
- Measured brightness1,265 nits vs 922 nits+37%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 374 ppi+10%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+6%
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 11 W+36%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold3 5G better than Razr 50 Ultra?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 12,7192.9×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+10%
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
- Screen size6.9″ vs 7.6″+10%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,768 px+64%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.4 mm+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 88.8%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 271 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 128.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse | Phantom Black, Phantom Silver, Phantom Green, Thom Browne Edition, Wooyoungmi Edition |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7.6″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,768 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,208 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,265 nits | 922 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,140,567 | 635,918 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,441 | 12,719 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,567 | 1,433 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 4 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 33% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 11 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.5 LUFS | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.04 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra7.36.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.96.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra5.06.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.86.9

