android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Flip 3

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (16) and where Galaxy Z Flip 3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

16 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Samsung · 2021Galaxy Z Flip 3

5.1Score

6 advantages≈ $510

9.1Display6.4

5.7Camera3.5

5.2Battery2.9

6.1Features7.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraGalaxy Z Flip 3

	Razr 50 Ultra	Galaxy Z Flip 3	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	166 mm	+5.4 mm
Width	74 mm	72.2 mm	+1.8 mm
Thickness	7.1 mm	6.9 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	189 g	183 g	+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Flip 3?

Main camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,300 mAh+21%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy Z Flip 3: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Max video4K vs 1080p
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+7%
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip 3 better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 162.7%+92%
Weight189 g vs 183 g+3%
Pixel density413 ppi vs 425 ppi+3%
USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.9 mm+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3≈ $5105.1
Design
Weight	189 g	183 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	6.9 mm
Height	171.4 mm	166 mm
Width	74 mm	72.2 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Glass
Ingress protection	IPX8	IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Cream, Phantom Black, Lavender, Green, Pink, White, Grey
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Dynamic Amoled 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	425 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	162.7%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	—
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 660
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	12 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	—
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	3,300 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	25 W
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	11 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	3.1
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 11
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 3.1
Major OS updates promised	3	—