How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 50 Ultra vs Find N2 Flip

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs OPPO Find N2 Flip

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (16) and where Find N2 Flip wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra
6.9Score
16 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
OPPO Find N2 Flip
OPPO · 2022Find N2 Flip
5.0Score
5 advantages≈ $530
9.1Display4.2
5.5Performance4.0
5.7Camera3.6
5.2Battery4.1
6.1Features5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraFind N2 Flip
74 × 171.47.175.2 × 166.27.5
Razr 50 UltraFind N2 FlipDifference
Height171.4 mm166.2 mm+5.2 mm
Width74 mm75.2 mm−1.2 mm
Thickness7.1 mm7.5 mm−0.4 mm
Weight189 g191 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Find N2 Flip?

  1. AnTuTu score1,140,567 vs 773,574+47%
  2. Optical stabilisationYes · Find N2 Flip: No
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Find N2 Flip: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Find N2 Flip: No
  5. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+88%
  6. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 3,265+36%
  8. Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
  9. Measured brightness1,265 nits vs 1,039 nits+22%
  10. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Find N2 Flip: No
  12. Pixel density413 ppi vs 403 ppi+2%

Why is Find N2 Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  2. Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+7%
  3. Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
  4. Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight189 g191 g
Thickness7.1 mm7.5 mm
Height171.4 mm166.2 mm
Width74 mm75.2 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerPlastic
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursSpring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha MousseAstral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold
Display
Screen size6.9″6.8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,520 px
Pixel density413 ppi403 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness1,265 nits1,039 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%86.4%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score1,140,567773,574
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,4413,265
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,567—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,000 mAh4,300 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)12.1 h—
Wired charging45 W44 W
Charged in 30 min—65%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-22.5 LUFS-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—ColorOS 14
Major OS updates promised34
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare