android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs Razr Ultra 2025

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2025

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (3) and where Razr Ultra 2025 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

3 advantages≈ $540

Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025

9.0Score

15 advantages≈ $600

Higher score

9.1Display9.6

5.7Camera8.8

5.2Battery8.0

6.1Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraRazr Ultra 2025

	Razr 50 Ultra	Razr Ultra 2025	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	171.5 mm	−0.1 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm	=
Thickness	7.1 mm	7.2 mm	−0.1 mm
Weight	189 g	199 g	−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Razr Ultra 2025?

Telephoto cameraYes · Razr Ultra 2025: No
Weight189 g vs 199 g+5%
Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is Razr Ultra 2025 better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Wired charging45 W vs 68 W+51%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+18%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+44%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Wireless charging power15 W vs 30 W2×
Pixel density413 ppi vs 464 ppi+12%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	Motorola Razr Ultra 2025≈ $6009.0
Design
Weight	189 g	199 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	7.2 mm
Height	171.4 mm	171.5 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Silicone polymer	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IPX8	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
Display
Screen size	6.9″	7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	464 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	84.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	4,700 mAh
Active use (test)	12.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	68 W
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	30 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—