- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 40 vs Flip 2
Motorola Razr 40 vs TCL Flip 2
What Razr 40 does better (28) and where Flip 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 40Flip 2
| Razr 40 | Flip 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.8 mm | 107.3 mm | +63.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 55.6 mm | +18.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 19.9 mm | −12.5 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 140 g | +49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 40 better than Flip 2?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 1,850 mAh2.3×
- RAM12 GB vs 1 GB12×
- Main camera64 MP vs 2 MP32×
- Wired charging30 W vs 5 W6×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 143 ppi2.9×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 330 nits4.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 16 GB16×
- Screen size6.9″ vs 2.8″2.5×
- OLED panelYes · Flip 2: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Flip 2: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Flip 2: No
Why is Flip 2 better than Razr 40?
- Weight189 g vs 140 g+35%
- Memory card slotNo · Razr 40: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Razr 40: Yes
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.6 LUFS vs -19.5 LUFS+-24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 140 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Height | 170.8 mm | 107.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 55.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac, Grape Compote, Cherry Blossom | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 330 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,064 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 40.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek MT6739-CH |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| AnTuTu score | 492,343 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,873 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 1 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 1,850 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 5 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 5 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.6 LUFS | -19.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | Barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 or KaiOS 3.1 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
