- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 2025 vs Zeus 2
Motorola Razr 2025 vs SPC Zeus 2
What Razr 2025 does better (23) and where Zeus 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 2025Zeus 2
| Razr 2025 | Zeus 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 145 mm | +26.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 10 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 161 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 2025 better than Zeus 2?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Wired charging30 W vs 10 W3×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 2,300 mAh+96%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 196 ppi2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelYes · Zeus 2: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Zeus 2: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Zeus 2: No
- 5GYes · Zeus 2: No
Why is Zeus 2 better than Razr 2025?
- Memory card slotNo · Razr 2025: Yes
- Weight188 g vs 161 g+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 161 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 145 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 5″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 854 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 196 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,189 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 63.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X | Mediatek MT6765 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 676,899 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,974 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,020 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 2,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 9.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 61% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (NA only) | fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 22 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
