- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 2024 vs Razr 40
Motorola Razr 2024 vs Motorola Razr 40
What Razr 2024 does better (7) and where Razr 40 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 2024Razr 40
| Razr 2024 | Razr 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 170.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 2024 better than Razr 40?
- AnTuTu score773,565 vs 492,343+57%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,400 nits2.1×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 5 W3×
- Measured brightness1,288 nits vs 1,064 nits+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
Why is Razr 40 better than Razr 2024?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Koala Grey, Beach Sand, Spritz Orange | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac, Grape Compote, Cherry Blossom |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,288 nits | 1,064 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | 773,565 | 492,343 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,900 | 2,873 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 59% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 5 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
