- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 2022 vs Mix Flip
Motorola Razr 2022 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip
What Razr 2022 does better (5) and where Mix Flip wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 2022Mix Flip
| Razr 2022 | Mix Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 167.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 79.8 mm | 74 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 2022 better than Mix Flip?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
- eSIMYes · Mix Flip: No
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS vs -27.6 LUFS+-8%
Why is Mix Flip better than Razr 2022?
- Wired charging30 W vs 67 W2.2×
- AnTuTu score965,260 vs 1,609,570+67%
- Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+37%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,944 vs 6,035+53%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 2022: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Measured brightness1,033 nits vs 1,314 nits+27%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Razr 2022: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 460 ppi+17%
- Weight200 g vs 190 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 167.5 mm |
| Width | 79.8 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Satin Black | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,033 nits | 1,314 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.3% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 965,260 | 1,609,570 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,944 | 6,035 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,209 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 4,780 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 12 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.4 LUFS | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
