android.gs
Compare
Razr 2022 vs Galaxy Z Flip7

Motorola Razr 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

What Razr 2022 does better (5) and where Galaxy Z Flip7 wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2022Razr 2022

5.9Score

5 advantages≈ $720

Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7

6.9Score

18 advantages≈ $600

Higher score

7.4Display5.3

4.3Performance7.2

7.1Camera4.9

2.8Battery4.6

4.0Features9.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 2022Galaxy Z Flip7

	Razr 2022	Galaxy Z Flip7	Difference
Height	167 mm	166.7 mm	+0.3 mm
Width	79.8 mm	75.2 mm	+4.6 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	6.5 mm	+1.1 mm
Weight	200 g	188 g	+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 2022 better than Galaxy Z Flip7?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
Max video8K vs 4K
Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS vs -26.1 LUFS+-3%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip7 better than Razr 2022?

AnTuTu score965,260 vs 1,513,134+57%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,944 vs 7,433+88%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+23%
Wireless chargingNo · Razr 2022: Yes
Measured brightness1,033 nits vs 1,471 nits+42%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
4K selfie videoNo · Razr 2022: Yes
Weight200 g vs 188 g+6%
CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 2022≈ $7205.9	Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7≈ $6006.9
Design
Weight	200 g	188 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	6.5 mm
Height	167 mm	166.7 mm
Width	79.8 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP52	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Satin Black	Blue Shadow, Jet Black, Coral Red, Mint
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable AMOLED	Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,520 px
Pixel density	393 ppi	397 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,033 nits	1,471 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	81.3%	88.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Exynos 2500
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Exynos
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Xclipse 950
AnTuTu score	965,260	1,513,134
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,944	7,433
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,636
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	3,500 mAh	4,300 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	30 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.69 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A