- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 2022 vs Galaxy Z Flip 3
Motorola Razr 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
What Razr 2022 does better (10) and where Galaxy Z Flip 3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.4
7.1Camera3.5
2.8Battery2.9
4.0Features7.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 2022Galaxy Z Flip 3
| Razr 2022 | Galaxy Z Flip 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 166 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 79.8 mm | 72.2 mm | +7.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 183 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 2022 better than Galaxy Z Flip 3?
- Main camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 3,300 mAh+6%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip 3 better than Razr 2022?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- Wireless chargingNo · Razr 2022: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio81.3% vs 162.7%2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Razr 2022: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 183 g+9%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 425 ppi+8%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 6.9 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 79.8 mm | 72.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Satin Black | Cream, Phantom Black, Lavender, Green, Pink, White, Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable AMOLED | Dynamic Amoled 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 1,033 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.3% | 162.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 965,260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,944 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 3,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 11 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 3.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4vsMotorola Razr 20226.15.9
vsMotorola Razr 40vsMotorola Razr 20224.75.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GvsMotorola Razr 20225.55.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5GvsMotorola Razr 20225.45.9vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 35.55.1
vsOPPO Find N2 FlipvsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 35.05.1