- android.gs
- Compare
- one 5G UW ace vs Galaxy A22
Motorola one 5G UW ace vs Samsung Galaxy A22
What one 5G UW ace does better (10) and where Galaxy A22 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display5.8
6.5Camera7.4
5.0Battery4.0
5.6Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
one 5G UW aceGalaxy A22
| one 5G UW ace | Galaxy A22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 159.3 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 186 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is one 5G UW ace better than Galaxy A22?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A22: No
- Wired charging20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 274 ppi+43%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A22 better than one 5G UW ace?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · one 5G UW ace: Yes
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · one 5G UW ace: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · one 5G UW ace: Yes
- Weight214 g vs 186 g+15%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 214 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Volcanic Gray | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 597 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 84.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 185,358 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,464 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 173 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
