- android.gs
- Compare
- One 5G Ace vs Galaxy F55
Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy F55
What One 5G Ace does better (2) and where Galaxy F55 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.8
6.5Camera8.5
4.0Battery6.8
5.6Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
One 5G AceGalaxy F55
| One 5G Ace | Galaxy F55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.9 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 180 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is One 5G Ace better than Galaxy F55?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy F55: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy F55 better than One 5G Ace?
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx73.5×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · One 5G Ace: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · One 5G Ace: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · One 5G Ace: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Process8 nm vs 4 nm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx7 |
| Colours | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver | Black, Apricot |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED+ |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | 540,590 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,079 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.93 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
