How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Moto X50 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What Moto X50 Ultra does better (13) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Moto X50 Ultra
9.2Score
13 advantages≈ $550
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
7 advantages
Higher score
9.5Display9.4
9.4Camera8.9
7.7Battery8.6
8.8Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto X50 UltraiQOO Neo9 Pro
72.4 × 161.18.675.7 × 163.58
Moto X50 UltraiQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height161.1 mm163.5 mm−2.4 mm
Width72.4 mm75.7 mm−3.3 mm
Thickness8.6 mm8 mm+0.6 mm
Weight197 g190 g+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto X50 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  5. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  6. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  7. Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
  8. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  10. USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
  11. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Moto X50 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+15%
  2. Max video4K vs 8K
  3. Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
  4. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
  5. Weight197 g vs 190 g+4%
  6. Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
  7. Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,260 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight197 g190 g
Thickness8.6 mm8 mm
Height161.1 mm163.5 mm
Width72.4 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusSchott Xensation Up
ColoursForest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach FuzzFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelP-OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,220 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,712 px2,800 px
Pixel density444 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,500 nits3,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio92.9%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 740
AnTuTu score—2,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—5,445
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.49"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging125 W120 W
Charged in 30 min—136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 Gen2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.12
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare