- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G9 Play vs X50 Pro
Motorola Moto G9 Play vs Vivo X50 Pro
What Moto G9 Play does better (3) and where X50 Pro wins (25) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display7.2
2.1Performance3.5
3.9Camera9.4
5.0Battery3.9
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G9 PlayX50 Pro
| Moto G9 Play | X50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.5 mm | +6.7 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 72.8 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 182 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G9 Play better than X50 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,315 mAh+16%
- Memory card slotYes · X50 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X50 Pro: No
Why is X50 Pro better than Moto G9 Play?
- AnTuTu score170,064 vs 323,736+90%
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging20 W vs 33 W+65%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G9 Play: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G9 Play: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Moto G9 Play: Yes
- 5GNo · Moto G9 Play: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,402 vs 1,937+38%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 398 ppi+48%
- Rear cameras1 vs 44×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Colours | Forest Green, Sapphire Blue, Spring Pink | Dark Blue, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 465 nits | 503 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2% | 90.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 11 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 170,064 | 323,736 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,402 | 1,937 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,315 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 57% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.34 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 10.5 |
