- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G8 Power vs Galaxy A51 5G
Motorola Moto G8 Power vs Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
What Moto G8 Power does better (7) and where Galaxy A51 5G wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display5.0
2.1Performance3.2
6.7Camera6.8
4.6Battery2.9
3.8Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G8 PowerGalaxy A51 5G
| Moto G8 Power | Galaxy A51 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 158.9 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 187 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G8 Power better than Galaxy A51 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A51 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A51 5G: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -29.5 LUFS+-17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/2+18%
Why is Galaxy A51 5G better than Moto G8 Power?
- Main camera16 MP vs 48 MP3×
- AnTuTu score173,607 vs 316,007+82%
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G8 Power: Yes
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GNo · Moto G8 Power: Yes
- NFCNo · Moto G8 Power: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,394 vs 1,867+34%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Moto G8 Power: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Smoke Black, Capri Blue | Prism Cube Black, Prism Cube White, Prism Cube Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,300 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 642 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 | Exynos 980 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 11 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 173,607 | 316,007 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,394 | 1,867 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -29.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.5 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
