- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G75 vs Galaxy M55
Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy M55
What Moto G75 does better (5) and where Galaxy M55 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.8
5.9Performance6.3
8.1Camera8.5
6.3Battery6.8
9.6Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G75Galaxy M55
| Moto G75 | Galaxy M55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.9 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 180 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G75 better than Galaxy M55?
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy M55: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,920 vs 2,785+5%
- eSIMYes · Galaxy M55: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Galaxy M55 better than Moto G75?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G75: Yes
- AnTuTu score790,810 vs 811,120+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Weight205 g vs 180 g+14%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.8 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green | Dark Blue, Light Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED+ |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 644 |
| AnTuTu score | 790,810 | 811,120 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,920 | 2,785 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.96 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
