android.gs
Compare
Moto G75 vs Galaxy A55

Motorola Moto G75 vs Samsung Galaxy A55

What Moto G75 does better (9) and where Galaxy A55 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Moto G75

8.2Score

9 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

Samsung · 2024Galaxy A55

8.1Score

5 advantages≈ $270

7.0Display7.4

5.9Performance6.3

8.1Camera8.3

6.3Battery5.0

9.6Features8.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G75Galaxy A55

	Moto G75	Galaxy A55	Difference
Height	166.1 mm	161.1 mm	+5 mm
Width	77.2 mm	77.4 mm	−0.2 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	205 g	213 g	−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G75 better than Galaxy A55?

AnTuTu score790,810 vs 635,598+24%
Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy A55: No
Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
Major OS updates promised5 vs 4+25%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
Weight205 g vs 213 g+4%
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
Charged in 30 min60% vs 55%+9%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%

Why is Galaxy A55 better than Moto G75?

RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
OLED panelNo · Moto G75: Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,920 vs 3,259+12%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+15%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G75≈ $2908.2	Samsung Galaxy A55≈ $2708.1
Design
Weight	205 g	213 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm
Height	166.1 mm	161.1 mm
Width	77.2 mm	77.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx7
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green	Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.6″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,388 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	387 ppi	390 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,010 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.8%	85.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3	Exynos 1480
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.75 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Xclipse 530
AnTuTu score	790,810	635,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,920	3,259
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,024
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	13.4 h
Wired charging	30 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	60%	55%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.68 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	5	4
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—