android.gs
Compare
Moto G75 vs CMF Phone 1

Motorola Moto G75 vs Nothing CMF Phone 1

What Moto G75 does better (14) and where CMF Phone 1 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Moto G75

8.2Score

14 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

Nothing · 2024CMF Phone 1

7.1Score

6 advantages≈ $270

7.0Display8.2

5.9Performance5.1

8.1Camera6.1

6.3Battery7.1

9.6Features4.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G75CMF Phone 1

	Moto G75	CMF Phone 1	Difference
Height	166.1 mm	164 mm	+2.1 mm
Width	77.2 mm	77 mm	+0.2 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	205 g	197 g	+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G75 better than CMF Phone 1?

AnTuTu score790,810 vs 536,089+48%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
Major OS updates promised5 vs 22.5×
Optical stabilisationYes · CMF Phone 1: No
Wireless chargingYes · CMF Phone 1: No
NFCYes · CMF Phone 1: No
Stereo speakersYes · CMF Phone 1: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,920 vs 2,801+4%
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · CMF Phone 1: No
4K selfie videoYes · CMF Phone 1: No
eSIMYes · CMF Phone 1: No

Why is CMF Phone 1 better than Moto G75?

OLED panelNo · Moto G75: Yes
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,000 nits2×
Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
Weight205 g vs 197 g+4%
Pixel density387 ppi vs 395 ppi+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G75≈ $2908.2	Nothing CMF Phone 1≈ $2707.1
Design
Weight	205 g	197 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm
Height	166.1 mm	164 mm
Width	77.2 mm	77 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP52
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx2
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	DragonTrail Pro
Colours	Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green	Black, Orange, Light Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,388 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	387 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	2,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,259 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.8%	85.1%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	790,810	536,089
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,920	2,801
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	851
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	16.2 h
Wired charging	30 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	60%	50%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	Nothing OS 4.0
Major OS updates promised	5	2
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—