- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G64 vs V40 Lite
Motorola Moto G64 vs Vivo V40 Lite
What Moto G64 does better (8) and where V40 Lite wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G64V40 Lite
| Moto G64 | V40 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.4 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G64 better than V40 Lite?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · V40 Lite: No
- Stereo speakersYes · V40 Lite: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+9%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V40 Lite: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 388 ppi+4%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is V40 Lite better than Moto G64?
- Peak brightness560 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
- AnTuTu score557,820 vs 697,953+25%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G64: Yes
- Wired charging30 W vs 44 W+47%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,472 vs 2,801+13%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight192 g vs 179 g+7%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac | Classy Brown, Dreamy White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 560 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 557,820 | 697,953 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,472 | 2,801 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 14 |
