- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G64 vs Camon 30
Motorola Moto G64 vs Tecno Camon 30
What Moto G64 does better (11) and where Camon 30 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G64Camon 30
| Moto G64 | Camon 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 165.3 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G64 better than Camon 30?
- 5GYes · Camon 30: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,472 vs 1,976+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 8 GB16×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 393 ppi+3%
- Weight192 g vs 198 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 better than Moto G64?
- Wired charging30 W vs 70 W2.3×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G64: Yes
- AnTuTu score557,820 vs 591,209+6%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Charged in 30 min45% vs 67%+49%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.5% vs 88.3%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 560 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 557,820 | 591,209 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,472 | 1,976 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
