- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G64 vs iQOO Z9 (China)
Motorola Moto G64 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (China)
What Moto G64 does better (5) and where iQOO Z9 (China) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display9.7
5.3Performance7.1
8.0Camera6.1
7.6Battery8.9
6.3Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G64iQOO Z9 (China)
| Moto G64 | iQOO Z9 (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G64 better than iQOO Z9 (China)?
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z9 (China): No
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z9 (China): No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z9 (China): No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · iQOO Z9 (China): No
Why is iQOO Z9 (China) better than Moto G64?
- Wired charging30 W vs 80 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score557,820 vs 1,027,925+84%
- Peak brightness560 nits vs 4,500 nits8×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G64: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,472 vs 3,062+24%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Charged in 30 min45% vs 88%+96%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 453 ppi+12%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 560 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 557,820 | 1,027,925 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,472 | 3,062 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | OriginOS 4 |
