- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G62 5G vs Poco M5s
Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5s
What Moto G62 5G does better (5) and where Poco M5s wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display6.5
3.1Performance3.2
6.6Camera7.0
4.0Battery6.0
6.3Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G62 5GPoco M5s
| Moto G62 5G | Poco M5s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 160.5 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G62 5G better than Poco M5s?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Poco M5s: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+7%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Poco M5s better than Moto G62 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G62 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- AnTuTu score303,072 vs 360,681+19%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme288 vs 421+46%
- Charged in 30 min24% vs 64%2.7×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,697 vs 1,831+8%
- Measured brightness552 nits vs 756 nits+37%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Gray, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 552 nits | 756 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 83.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 303,072 | 360,681 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,697 | 1,831 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 288 | 421 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 24% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.9 LUFS | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 13 |
