- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G62 5G vs Poco M5
Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Xiaomi Poco M5
What Moto G62 5G does better (11) and where Poco M5 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display5.1
3.1Performance3.4
6.6Camera4.1
4.0Battery4.6
6.3Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G62 5GPoco M5
| Moto G62 5G | Poco M5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 164 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G62 5G better than Poco M5?
- 5GYes · Poco M5: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco M5: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 5 MP3.2×
- Measured brightness552 nits vs 448 nits+23%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M5: No
- Weight184 g vs 201 g+9%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.9 LUFS vs -27.6 LUFS+-6%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+3%
Why is Poco M5 better than Moto G62 5G?
- AnTuTu score303,072 vs 386,311+27%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,697 vs 1,896+12%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme288 vs 340+18%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Black, Green, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 552 nits | 448 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 303,072 | 386,311 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,697 | 1,896 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 288 | 340 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 24% | 24% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.9 LUFS | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
