- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G62 5G vs Galaxy A13
Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13
What Moto G62 5G does better (13) and where Galaxy A13 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display4.2
3.1Performance2.2
6.6Camera5.8
4.0Battery4.0
6.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G62 5GGalaxy A13
| Moto G62 5G | Galaxy A13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 165.1 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 195 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G62 5G better than Galaxy A13?
- AnTuTu score303,072 vs 122,8222.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,697 vs 5882.9×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy A13: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A13: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Weight184 g vs 195 g+6%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.9 LUFS vs -29.7 LUFS+-13%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.2% vs 83.2%+2%
Why is Galaxy A13 better than Moto G62 5G?
- Measured brightness552 nits vs 587 nits+6%
- Charged in 30 min24% vs 27%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 165.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 552 nits | 587 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 83.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Exynos 850 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 |
| AnTuTu score | 303,072 | 122,822 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,697 | 588 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 288 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 24% | 27% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.9 LUFS | -29.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
