- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G53 vs Narzo 50 Pro
Motorola Moto G53 vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
What Moto G53 does better (5) and where Narzo 50 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display7.2
4.6Camera6.0
4.6Battery6.0
9.1Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G53Narzo 50 Pro
| Moto G53 | Narzo 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.2 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 73.3 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 181 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G53 better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- NFCYes · Narzo 50 Pro: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Memory card slotYes · Narzo 50 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Narzo 50 Pro: No
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Moto G53?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G53: Yes
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 411 ppi+52%
- Charged in 30 min22% vs 48%2.2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G53: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.2 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 73.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 599 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 314,195 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,594 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 292 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 22% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | realme UI 3 |
