- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G51 5G vs Redmi Note 10 Pro
Motorola Moto G51 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
What Moto G51 5G does better (3) and where Redmi Note 10 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.8
3.1Performance3.2
6.2Camera7.3
5.0Battery7.1
5.6Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G51 5GRedmi Note 10 Pro
| Moto G51 5G | Redmi Note 10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.5 mm | 164 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.5 mm | = |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.1 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 193 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G51 5G better than Redmi Note 10 Pro?
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 10 Pro: No
- AnTuTu score302,859 vs 295,442+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 10 Pro better than Moto G51 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging20 W vs 33 W+65%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,696 vs 1,780+5%
- Measured brightness595 nits vs 725 nits+22%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Weight208 g vs 193 g+8%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 395 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 170.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | Onyx Gray, Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 595 nits | 725 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 85.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 302,859 | 295,442 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,696 | 1,780 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 336 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 59% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
