- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G51 5G vs Galaxy A22
Motorola Moto G51 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22
What Moto G51 5G does better (12) and where Galaxy A22 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.8
3.1Performance3.5
6.2Camera7.4
5.0Battery4.0
5.6Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G51 5GGalaxy A22
| Moto G51 5G | Galaxy A22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.5 mm | 159.3 mm | +11.2 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 186 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G51 5G better than Galaxy A22?
- AnTuTu score302,859 vs 185,358+63%
- 5GYes · Galaxy A22: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 274 ppi+41%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.3 LUFS vs -30.6 LUFS+-8%
Why is Galaxy A22 better than Moto G51 5G?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,696 vs 5,4643.2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Weight208 g vs 186 g+12%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 170.5 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 595 nits | 597 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 302,859 | 185,358 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,696 | 5,464 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 173 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | -30.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
