- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G51 5G vs Galaxy A52 5G
Motorola Moto G51 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
What Moto G51 5G does better (2) and where Galaxy A52 5G wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.4
3.1Performance3.3
6.2Camera8.7
5.0Battery3.2
5.6Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G51 5GGalaxy A52 5G
| Moto G51 5G | Galaxy A52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.5 mm | 159.9 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.1 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 189 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G51 5G better than Galaxy A52 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+5%
Why is Galaxy A52 5G better than Moto G51 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx73.5×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G51 5G: Yes
- AnTuTu score302,859 vs 334,981+11%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging20 W vs 25 W+25%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,696 vs 1,820+7%
- Measured brightness595 nits vs 787 nits+32%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 170.5 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 595 nits | 787 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 302,859 | 334,981 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,696 | 1,820 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 333 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.05 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
