- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G50 vs Galaxy A52
Motorola Moto G50 vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What Moto G50 does better (4) and where Galaxy A52 wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display6.9
2.4Performance4.3
4.2Camera8.7
4.0Battery3.2
5.7Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50Galaxy A52
| Moto G50 | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.9 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 189 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 better than Galaxy A52?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A52: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- AnTuTu score286,916 vs 261,282+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Moto G50?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,620 vs 5,8653.6×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx72.3×
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- Measured brightness362 nits vs 794 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 407 ppi+51%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 362 nits | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,916 | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,620 | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 291 | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28 LUFS | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
