- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G50 vs Galaxy A22
Motorola Moto G50 vs Samsung Galaxy A22
What Moto G50 does better (6) and where Galaxy A22 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display5.8
2.4Performance3.5
4.2Camera7.4
4.0Battery4.0
5.7Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50Galaxy A22
| Moto G50 | Galaxy A22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.3 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 73.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 186 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 better than Galaxy A22?
- AnTuTu score286,916 vs 185,358+55%
- 5GYes · Galaxy A22: No
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme291 vs 173+68%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28 LUFS vs -30.6 LUFS+-8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A22 better than Moto G50?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,620 vs 5,4643.4×
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Measured brightness362 nits vs 597 nits+65%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Weight192 g vs 186 g+3%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.4 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 362 nits | 597 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,916 | 185,358 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,620 | 5,464 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 291 | 173 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28 LUFS | -30.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
