- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G50 5G vs Galaxy A22 5G
Motorola Moto G50 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
What Moto G50 5G does better (2) and where Galaxy A22 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display4.3
4.2Camera5.3
4.0Battery4.0
5.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50 5GGalaxy A22 5G
| Moto G50 5G | Galaxy A22 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 167.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 203 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 5G better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Moto G50 5G?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 399 ppi+48%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G50 5G: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 9 mm+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.5% vs 82.3%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Meteorite Grey | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 385 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 82.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,155 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,913 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.73 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Nord N200 5GvsMotorola Moto G50 5G5.55.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G5.95.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro5.95.9
