- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G32 vs Pova 4
Motorola Moto G32 vs Tecno Pova 4
What Moto G32 does better (13) and where Pova 4 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G32Pova 4
| Moto G32 | Pova 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 170.6 mm | −8.8 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 77.5 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 214 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G32 better than Pova 4?
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 257 ppi+58%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight184 g vs 214 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 25%+52%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Pova 4 better than Moto G32?
- AnTuTu score430,185 vs 540,584+26%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,436 vs 1,640+14%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 257 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 430,185 | 540,584 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,436 | 1,640 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 343 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 12 |
