- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G32 vs Moto G84
Motorola Moto G32 vs Motorola Moto G84
What Moto G32 does better (3) and where Moto G84 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G32Moto G84
| Moto G32 | Moto G84 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 160 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 167 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G32 better than Moto G84?
- AnTuTu score430,185 vs 389,015+11%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Moto G84 better than Moto G32?
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,300 nits2.9×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G32: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G32: Yes
- 5GNo · Moto G32: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,436 vs 1,824+27%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Weight184 g vs 167 g+10%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 54%+42%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.6 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 430,185 | 389,015 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,436 | 1,824 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
