- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G32 vs Reno7 Lite
Motorola Moto G32 vs OPPO Reno7 Lite
What Moto G32 does better (7) and where Reno7 Lite wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display5.7
3.6Performance3.5
6.6Camera6.1
5.5Battery4.2
6.2Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G32Reno7 Lite
| Moto G32 | Reno7 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 159.9 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 73.2 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.5 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 173 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G32 better than Reno7 Lite?
- AnTuTu score430,185 vs 315,250+36%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno7 Lite: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Reno7 Lite: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Why is Reno7 Lite better than Moto G32?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G32: Yes
- 5GNo · Moto G32: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,436 vs 1,996+39%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight184 g vs 173 g+6%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 62%+63%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.5 mm+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 657 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 430,185 | 315,250 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,436 | 1,996 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 12 |
