- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G200 5G vs Narzo 50 Pro
Motorola Moto G200 5G vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
What Moto G200 5G does better (11) and where Narzo 50 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.2
7.6Camera6.0
6.0Battery6.0
6.3Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G200 5GNarzo 50 Pro
| Moto G200 5G | Narzo 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.1 mm | 160.2 mm | +7.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 73.3 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 181 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G200 5G better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 48 MP2.2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Narzo 50 Pro: No
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.99 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 84.2%+3%
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Moto G200 5G?
- OLED panelNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Moto G200 5G: Yes
- Weight202 g vs 181 g+12%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 411 ppi+4%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8 mm+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 168.1 mm | 160.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 73.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 558 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.99 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 682,346 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,319 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | realme UI 3 |
