- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G10 Power vs Redmi Note 9T
Motorola Moto G10 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T
What Moto G10 Power does better (5) and where Redmi Note 9T wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display3.6
5.3Camera5.4
7.3Battery4.6
2.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G10 PowerRedmi Note 9T
| Moto G10 Power | Redmi Note 9T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 161.2 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 199 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G10 Power better than Redmi Note 9T?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 9T: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9T better than Moto G10 Power?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GNo · Moto G10 Power: Yes
- NFCNo · Moto G10 Power: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G10 Power: Yes
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Weight220 g vs 199 g+11%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Process11 nm vs 7 nm+57%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 161.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Aurora Grey, Breeze Blue | Nightfall Black, Daybreak Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 471 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 | Mediatek Dimensity 800U |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 11 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 288,732 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,775 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 33% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.01 W/kg | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
