- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2023) vs Camon 20
Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Tecno Camon 20
What Moto G (2023) does better (7) and where Camon 20 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display5.6
3.3Performance2.8
3.9Camera6.4
4.0Battery6.0
6.2Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2023)Camon 20
| Moto G (2023) | Camon 20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2023) better than Camon 20?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- AnTuTu score499,266 vs 346,842+44%
- 5GYes · Camon 20: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,816 vs 1,360+34%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 better than Moto G (2023)?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Dual SIMNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 500 nits+11%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 38%+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Ink Blue | Predawn Black, Glacier Glow, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 499,266 | 346,842 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,816 | 1,360 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | HIOS 14 |
