- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2023) vs Galaxy M14
Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy M14
What Moto G (2023) does better (5) and where Galaxy M14 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display4.8
3.3Performance4.6
3.9Camera5.2
4.0Battery7.5
6.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2023)Galaxy M14
| Moto G (2023) | Galaxy M14 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 166.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 206 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2023) better than Galaxy M14?
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M14: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Weight189 g vs 206 g+9%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.4 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M14 better than Moto G (2023)?
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- AnTuTu score499,266 vs 607,489+22%
- NFCNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 400 ppi+48%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,816 vs 1,963+8%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Dual SIMNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Process8 nm vs 5 nm+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ink Blue | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 81.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 499,266 | 607,489 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,816 | 1,963 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 364 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI core 5.1 |
