- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto E32 vs Galaxy M13
Motorola Moto E32 vs Samsung Galaxy M13
What Moto E32 does better (4) and where Galaxy M13 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display3.9
3.7Camera5.8
4.6Battery4.0
2.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto E32Galaxy M13
| Moto E32 | Galaxy M13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 165.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 192 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto E32 better than Galaxy M13?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Weight184 g vs 192 g+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.2% vs 82.5%+2%
Why is Galaxy M13 better than Moto E32?
- Main camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCNo · Moto E32: Yes
- Pixel density268 ppi vs 400 ppi+49%
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto E32: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Misty Silver, Pearl Blue, Slate Grey | Deep Green, Orange Copper, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 441 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 82.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Exynos 850 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 228,034 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,522 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI Core 4.1 |
